posted by [identity profile] laurainlimbo.livejournal.com at 10:49pm on 11/03/2010
that is funny because that review I read didn't mention that the movie is meant to be 13 years later. I figured because Alice is older that it's meant to be an extension or different adaptation of the story, but I hadn't really known that. so that makes more sense:) I wish I had more desire to see this version because Alice's Adventures in Wonderland was one of my favorite books growing up. It's so complex, and perhaps that's why Tim Burton is drawn to it. But I guess I'd love to see what he'd do with the original story, too:)

Reply

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25 26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31