wolfpurplemoon: A cute cartoon character with orange hair, glasses, kitty ears and holding a coffee, the colours are bright and pinkish/purple (mad hatter)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] wolfpurplemoon at 10:41pm on 11/03/2010
That's a fun article about Johnny Depp's roles, while I (obviously) knew that his roles were not of the norm (which is part of the appeal) I'd never seen it analysed quite that way before.

I couldn't watch Before Night Falls, I think I ended up skipping through it to find Johnny's scenes, the rest of it didn't interest me at all.

As for film adaptations of books (or Shakespeare), I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on that. Purism is commendable but artistic vision does not need to be restricted by source material, especially when the source has been adapted many times.

Off the top of my head, there is one film (Manhunter) I didn't like because it managed to throw out the best material of a book I'd enjoyed (and the title so I can forgive it somewhat and pretend it's not a Hannibal Lecter film) but I've come to realise that film is an entirely different artistic medium to books so there have to be differences.

In Charlie and the Chocolate factory Johnny's actual performance may not be exactly like the Wonka of the book, but the film itself is a far truer adaptation than the Gene Wilder version (which, incidentally, Roald Dahl himself hated and they rewrote his screenplay, although they left him with a writing credit), though that is not the main reason I prefer the newer adaptation.

I was probably just the right age when Baz Luhman's Romeo + Juliet came out and I really enjoyed it (and I agree with [livejournal.com profile] bitchygrrl on that, even our English teacher allowed us to watch the film when we were studying the play!).

But anyway, I've just come back from seeing Alice in Wonderland and I thoroughly enjoyed it, I can't disagree more with that review you've linked to (apart from the dig at 3D) Empire's is far more even handed here.

The only reason anyone could possibly think that the Mad Hatter is Alice's love interest is because all the people from her real life are represented by characters in Wonderland and the Mad Hatter appears to be the man everyone wants her to marry and I suppose he also represents her father (he definitely has multiple personalities) so it's more of a paternal love than a romantic one.

Well, this has turned into a long comment! I'm not sure if I've managed to properly explain my thoughts, I know my feelings but can't always express them coherently!

Good luck with your Japanese lessons! *hug*
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] laurainlimbo.livejournal.com at 11:03pm on 11/03/2010
I know lots of people disagree with me on the Shakespeare adaptations, and I have liked several film versions of his works, including Zefferelli's Romeo and Juliet which came out the year I was born, and which was the one I watched in high school (yes, I'm that old - LOL!) I guess I was going through a phase at time, and couldn't see the creative aspects of Baz Luhrman's Romeo and Juliet when it came out. There was another Shakespeare adaptation that I tried watching, Hamlet with Ethan Hawke (2000) - it was set in modern-day New York City, and I couldn't watch more than 10 minutes. it just felt weird. I loved Mel Gibson's Hamlet though! Like I said, I guess I'm just a purist at heart:)

I have heard people say that Burton's version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was truer to the book, but I grew up with Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, so I just couldn't enjoy Johnny's freaky adaptation of the character. it comes down to personal taste, I guess.

and while I'm all for artistic vision in adapting a book, I just hate to think that younger generations may not know how wonderful the original books were if they only see this Burton version of Alice. That's what another friend said here too. I hope they'll be intrigued enough by it to read the books and see what they're missing:) Shakespeare too!

thanks for the long comment- I replied with the same - LOL! it's fun to see different viewpoints:)
Edited Date: 2010-03-11 11:06 pm (UTC)
[link] [parent] [reply]
wolfpurplemoon: A cute cartoon character with orange hair, glasses, kitty ears and holding a coffee, the colours are bright and pinkish/purple (duckling6)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] wolfpurplemoon at 11:52pm on 13/03/2010
I would also hope that any film adaptation would make children curious to read the original book, unless it's Twilight of course! :D
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] laurainlimbo.livejournal.com at 10:44pm on 15/03/2010
sadly they probably prefer reading Twilight!

and this is why I'm making myself responsible for buying classic books for my niece and nephew, in case my sister doesn't:) I'll read with them when I visit!
[link] [parent] [reply]

December

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
 2
 
 3
 
4
 
 5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
11
 
 12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
25
1
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31