(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] laurainlimbo.livejournal.com at 11:35pm on 11/03/2010
I guess it's an adaptation, so Burton felt he had creative, artistic license. but I guess I'm not interested - LOL!

there are probably examples of movies that were better than the books - I've heard that was the case with Gone with the Wind. But the classics like Alice are best read, I think:)

thanks hon!
*hugs*
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] serialbathera.livejournal.com at 06:44am on 14/03/2010
True, sometimes those gambles with "adaptations" work well, and you enjoy it, and other times, not so much.

Hmm, I haven't heard that about Gone with the Wind, but I have had no desire to see movie, or watch book. I just read both Alice books for the first time recently and really enjoyed them. They are fun books :)

::hugs::
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] laurainlimbo.livejournal.com at 10:38pm on 15/03/2010
Gone with the Wind is really a fantastic film - if you can sit through it! it's something close to four hours long. it takes patience:) the Alice books are great - and there's no copyright on them anymore, so I just downloaded a pdf file so I can read it again!

*hugs*
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] serialbathera.livejournal.com at 07:39am on 16/03/2010
hmm, maybe if I have 4 hours to watch a movie, I will think about renting GWTW. Yay for no copyrights, so you can read free stuff :)

::hugs::
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] laurainlimbo.livejournal.com at 01:06pm on 17/03/2010
well I'd suggest watching GWTW in segments, an hour here and there. all at once it's pretty tiresome:)

*hugs*
[link] [parent] [reply]

December

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
 2
 
 3
 
4
 
 5
 
 6
 
 7
 
 8
 
 9
 
 10
 
11
 
 12
 
 13
 
 14
 
 15
 
 16
 
 17
 
18
 
 19
 
 20
 
 21
 
 22
 
 23
 
 24
 
25
1
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
 
 31